More Weight Loss Solutions

Looking for a kickass new backpack? Consider the tried and true Marine Corps ‘FILBE’ – Military Times

Feb 12th, 2020

In 2012, the USMC began fielding a new suite of load bearing gear dubbed FILBE. This Family of Improved Load Bearing Equipment has accompanied Marine line units into combat operations ever since.

Now, new and used offerings are reaching the civilian market at increasingly competitive prices (sometimes as low as $130 for the main pack/frame/belt setup), making it a viable option for many civilian applications including hiking, hunting, and physical fitness.

Why the USMC FILBE? As Ive been hinting, this pack is all about value (similar packs will cost in the vicinity of $600, and often more). It hits far above its weight class in terms of durability, modularity, reliability, and cross compatibility, and does so at an unrivaled price point.

It is important to note that there was a manufacturing defect in early production bags made by Eagle for which reinforcement parts, and instructions, were issued. No need to feel apprehensive though.

Constructed out of 500 denier Cordura Nylon with 1000D reinforcement points, you can be sure that this heavy-duty pack will stand up to whatever you throw at it.

However, the USMC FILBE isnt without its shortfalls.

Lets begin with the frame.

Instructions from the manufacturer indicate this pack may be adjusted to either the normal or long-torso setting.

Get your fill of tactical coolness with guns, gear, bullets and moto content each week.

(please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Subscribe

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Gear Scout Weekly newsletter.

Unfortunately, the long-torso setting is only barely enough to accommodate a 6 foot tall person likely an attempt to make a one size fits all pack for the USMC. So, if you are over 6 feet, tall I suggest considering other options.

For a pack that was at least partially designed by Mystery Ranch, youd think such an important component as the hip belt wouldnt have been overlooked, but thats not the case.

When worn properly, the majority of the weight of a ruck should rest on the hips. Thats a challenge for the FILBE as the belt constantly slips loose under load.

In my experience, this wasnt such a phenomenon in the 60-70lbs range, but going up to 80lbs and higher resulted in the belt constantly loosening and thus transferring weight to your shoulders.

Thats not an ideal situation for a pack allegedly designed to accommodate up to 120lbs.

Another issue with the hip belt is that it's comically thin. Offering minimal padding for your hips means youll be reaching your destination with a lot of aches and soreness.

There are, however, alternatives to the stock belt that offer a welcome improvement, but it shouldnt be necessary to seek these items out to supplement a pack designed for front line service.

The external frame presents another major problem. When hiking, I prefer to have heavier weight situated higher up in the bag and close to my torso so that its more in line with my center of gravity.

The FILBE does exactly the opposite and, rather than resting on your hips, gives the sensation that the weight is hanging off your back. This forces you to fight and counterbalance awkwardly as you move hardly suitable for long distance movements.

Finally, if you are thinking of using this bag in extreme cold, think twice.

It may sound like Im giving this bag a hard time, but I still think that it offers an unbeatable amount of capabilities for its price range.

It performs very well doing primary rucking duty when the weight is kept under 60lbs. Upgrade the belt as mentioned and that capability increases even further.

It also makes a great go-bag for your car. You can fit loads of gear in it and use the compression straps to keep the size minimal. If the time ever comes, youll be very well equipped.

Even if you already have one of the more expensive bags available, a military surplus FILBE makes for a great loaner or backup to your main ruck too.

Despite its issues, the USMC FILBE is certainly one of the top tier value-based packs available on the market today. Buy it, ruck with it, see how it behaves on long hikes, and upgrade it to fit your needs. At such a low price point, you definitely wont regret picking one up while they last.

Jake is a correspondent with Gear Scout. A veteran of the Marine Corps, Jake is also an avid outdoorsman, military history buff and firearms enthusiast.

Go here to read the rest:
Looking for a kickass new backpack? Consider the tried and true Marine Corps 'FILBE' - Military Times

Related Post

Contact One Of Our Consultants Today


Your Full Name
Your Email
Your Phone Number
Select your age (30+ only)
Confirm over 30 years old  Yes
Confirm that you are a US Citizen  Yes
This is a Serious Inquiry  Yes
Select A Program
Duration
Select Your US State
captcha Please Enter Code:


Tags:
Comments are closed.
Weight Loss Solutions